<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Biodiversity Offsets Blog &#187; &#187; the business case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/tag/the-business-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net</link>
	<description>A Platform for Information and Exchange on Biodiversity Offsets and the Mitigation Hierarchy by Marianne Darbi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2017 14:57:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>What is the Business Case for Biodiversity Offsets? — my new paper in SQ — raising the sustainability quotient</title>
		<link>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/what-is-the-business-case-for-biodiversity-offsets-my-new-paper-in-sq-raising-the-sustainability-quotient/</link>
		<comments>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/what-is-the-business-case-for-biodiversity-offsets-my-new-paper-in-sq-raising-the-sustainability-quotient/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 06:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marianne Darbi]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Literature on Biodiversity Offsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity offsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the business case]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/?p=2263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Some time ago I have been asked by Divya Narain if I could contribute an article to the latest issue on business and biodiversity of “SQ — raising the sustainability quotient” –the bulletin of the Bombay Chamber of Commerce and &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/what-is-the-business-case-for-biodiversity-offsets-my-new-paper-in-sq-raising-the-sustainability-quotient/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/what-is-the-business-case-for-biodiversity-offsets-my-new-paper-in-sq-raising-the-sustainability-quotient/">What is the Business Case for Biodiversity Offsets? — my new paper in SQ — raising the sustainability quotient</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net">Biodiversity Offsets Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/what-is-the-business-case-for-biodiversity-offsets-my-new-paper-in-sq-raising-the-sustainability-quotient/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Biodiversity Offsets still relevant for India — a comment by Divya Narain</title>
		<link>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/are-biodiversity-offsets-still-relevant-for-india-a-comment-by-divya-narain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/are-biodiversity-offsets-still-relevant-for-india-a-comment-by-divya-narain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[guest]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Worldwide examples of Biodiversity Offsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity offsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the business case]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/?p=1984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a guest post by Divya Narain, Learning manager at Environmental Management Center in Mumbai, India. This comment has previously been published on Divya’s Blog. It is the expression of the author’s thoughts and experiences and as such is &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/are-biodiversity-offsets-still-relevant-for-india-a-comment-by-divya-narain/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/are-biodiversity-offsets-still-relevant-for-india-a-comment-by-divya-narain/">Are Biodiversity Offsets still relevant for India — a comment by Divya Narain</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net">Biodiversity Offsets Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/are-biodiversity-offsets-still-relevant-for-india-a-comment-by-divya-narain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A review of corporate goals of No Net Loss and Net Positive Impact on biodiversity — paper by Rainey et al</title>
		<link>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/review-corporate-goals-no-net-loss-net-positive-impact-biodiversity-paper-rainey-et-al/</link>
		<comments>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/review-corporate-goals-no-net-loss-net-positive-impact-biodiversity-paper-rainey-et-al/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marianne Darbi]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Literature on Biodiversity Offsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coporate goals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net positive impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no net loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the business case]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/?p=1771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Hugo  Rainey, Edward  Pollard, Guy Dutson, Jonathan M. Ekstrom, Suzanne Livingstone, Helen Temple and John Pilgrim have published a paper entitled “A review of corporate goals of No Net Loss and Net Positive Impact on biodiversity” in Oryx. The International &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/review-corporate-goals-no-net-loss-net-positive-impact-biodiversity-paper-rainey-et-al/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/review-corporate-goals-no-net-loss-net-positive-impact-biodiversity-paper-rainey-et-al/">A review of corporate goals of No Net Loss and Net Positive Impact on biodiversity — paper by Rainey et al</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net">Biodiversity Offsets Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/review-corporate-goals-no-net-loss-net-positive-impact-biodiversity-paper-rainey-et-al/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biodiversity Offsets need a strong regulatory system! Or voluntary engagement?</title>
		<link>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/biodiversity-offsets-need-strong-regulatory-system-voluntary-engagement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/biodiversity-offsets-need-strong-regulatory-system-voluntary-engagement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 13:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marianne Darbi]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[About Biodiversity Offsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[About my PhD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policies and Governance of Biodiversity Offsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity offsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eingriffsregelung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory biodiversity offsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory offsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no net loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Net Loss Initiative of the EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory offsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the business case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voluntary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voluntary biodiversity offsets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/?p=806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Biodiversity Offsets under regulatory systems A decade ago offsets only existed under several regulatory systems e.g. Environmental Impact Assessment, US Wetland Mitigation, German Impact Mitigation Regulation and other (see table below for some selected more). The business case and voluntary &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/biodiversity-offsets-need-strong-regulatory-system-voluntary-engagement/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/biodiversity-offsets-need-strong-regulatory-system-voluntary-engagement/">Biodiversity Offsets need a strong regulatory system! Or voluntary engagement?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net">Biodiversity Offsets Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/biodiversity-offsets-need-strong-regulatory-system-voluntary-engagement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
