<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why would you say YES to the EU No Net Loss Initiative?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/why-would-you-say-yes-to-the-eu-no-net-loss-initiative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/why-would-you-say-yes-to-the-eu-no-net-loss-initiative/</link>
	<description>A Platform for Information and Exchange on Biodiversity Offsets and the Mitigation Hierarchy by Marianne Darbi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 16:49:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Consultation on the EU No Net Loss Initiative: Biodiversity offsetting can, under certain circumstances, improve nature and biodiversity conservation — a comment by Heidi Wittmer - Biodiversity Offsets Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/why-would-you-say-yes-to-the-eu-no-net-loss-initiative/#comment-1011</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Consultation on the EU No Net Loss Initiative: Biodiversity offsetting can, under certain circumstances, improve nature and biodiversity conservation — a comment by Heidi Wittmer - Biodiversity Offsets Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/?p=1279#comment-1011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] 3. Why would you say YES to the EU No Net Loss initiative?  [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] 3. Why would you say YES to the EU No Net Loss initiative?  […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marianne Darbi</title>
		<link>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/why-would-you-say-yes-to-the-eu-no-net-loss-initiative/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marianne Darbi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/?p=1279#comment-827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your comment! What you say is really ambitious (would be good if we could arrive at some point sooner or later). But I think we also need to keep in mind, that we should not only look at shaping a &quot;universally acceptable strategy and program for biodiversity conservation&quot;, but also have a critical look at the possible outcomes. And this comes to the very point of criticism on the No Net Loss Initiative and the like: even if the intentions are well-meant, will the outcomes be as good, too?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment! What you say is really ambitious (would be good if we could arrive at some point sooner or later). But I think we also need to keep in mind, that we should not only look at shaping a “universally acceptable strategy and program for biodiversity conservation”, but also have a critical look at the possible outcomes. And this comes to the very point of criticism on the No Net Loss Initiative and the like: even if the intentions are well-meant, will the outcomes be as good, too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr UN Nandakumar</title>
		<link>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/why-would-you-say-yes-to-the-eu-no-net-loss-initiative/#comment-814</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr UN Nandakumar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 09:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/?p=1279#comment-814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is a good initiative and will help in promoting a comprehensive approach for Biodiversity conservation all over the world. The approach should be to evolve an all encompassing universally acceptable  strategy and program for biodiversity conservation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a good initiative and will help in promoting a comprehensive approach for Biodiversity conservation all over the world. The approach should be to evolve an all encompassing universally acceptable  strategy and program for biodiversity conservation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why would you say NO to the EU No Net Loss Initiative? - Biodiversity Offsets Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/why-would-you-say-yes-to-the-eu-no-net-loss-initiative/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why would you say NO to the EU No Net Loss Initiative? - Biodiversity Offsets Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/?p=1279#comment-661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] &#8592; Consultation on the EU No Net Loss Initiative: Biodiversity offsetting can, under certain circumstances, improve nature and biodiversity conservation — a comment by Heidi Wittmer Why would you say YES to the EU No Net Loss Initiative? &#8594; [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] ← Consultation on the EU No Net Loss Initiative: Biodiversity offsetting can, under certain circumstances, improve nature and biodiversity conservation — a comment by Heidi Wittmer Why would you say YES to the EU No Net Loss Initiative? → […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
