<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Experts and Exchange</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/experts-exchange/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net</link>
	<description>A Platform for Information and Exchange on Biodiversity Offsets and the Mitigation Hierarchy by Marianne Darbi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 16:49:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Bacher</title>
		<link>http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/experts-exchange/#comment-11826</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Bacher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biodiversityoffsets.net/?page_id=300#comment-11826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to stress the peculiar origins of how this emerged in Niagara and from it Ontario. The goal is to allow urban development on provincially significant wetlands that are now protected from it. 

I wish to stress that I am not a dogmatist opposed to financial incentives, trading mechanisms etc. to protect the environment. During the NDP government in Ontario there was a push for phosphorous trading to reduce pollution, which was actually taken up by one conservation authority, South Nation, between Ottawa and Montreal. In all the rest of the province, including Niagara it went nowhere. This is because it did not fit into the agendas of the same sort of construction interests here that are pushing biodiversity offsetting. They correctly understood that phosphorous  trading would mean less money for expensive construction activity, such as separating storm and sanitary sewers, and wanted to hog the money for themselves, and not let rural landowners benefit from measures such as paying for treed buffer strips.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to stress the peculiar origins of how this emerged in Niagara and from it Ontario. The goal is to allow urban development on provincially significant wetlands that are now protected from it. </p>
<p>I wish to stress that I am not a dogmatist opposed to financial incentives, trading mechanisms etc. to protect the environment. During the NDP government in Ontario there was a push for phosphorous trading to reduce pollution, which was actually taken up by one conservation authority, South Nation, between Ottawa and Montreal. In all the rest of the province, including Niagara it went nowhere. This is because it did not fit into the agendas of the same sort of construction interests here that are pushing biodiversity offsetting. They correctly understood that phosphorous  trading would mean less money for expensive construction activity, such as separating storm and sanitary sewers, and wanted to hog the money for themselves, and not let rural landowners benefit from measures such as paying for treed buffer strips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
